Guilt and Judgment
Recently, I was watching a baseball game at a local pub and talking with a server friend of mine. We were talking about some philosophical issue and right in the middle of the conversation my friend threw out this question: “you aren’t trying to get me to go to church are you? Because I am not going.” I was stunned, but took up the question. “I would love for you to go to church, but not because I get another star by my name and need only three more to win a prize. I want you to come because I think you just might find what you are looking for. It’s just for one hour. And if you don’t like it you don’t ever have to go back. But it just seems to me that if you are looking for meaning and identity you ought to look in all places offering those things. Church, if it is preaching the gospel, deals in those areas directly.” “Yeah, I guess that’s a good point. But aren’t they just going to tell me I need to be healed emotionally or something like that. I don’t need to be healed from anything.”
This is not the only experience of this type I have had. Many of my non-christian friends will talk about Christianity, but they balk at the idea of church. And many of them have had, at various times in their life, experiences that have turned them off to traditional religion and Christianity in particular.
When I hear a complaint from a non-believing friend that they felt judged the last time they were in church, I hear two things. Perhaps she was actually judged by someone, and the extent to which she could feel this palpably from the churchmembers is a failure to be sure. But the other thing is that beneath her resentment and anger at the church for judging her, is real and palpable guilt.
In an attempt to be accommodating, and open, my friends and I have often been too eager to judge the church for its judgmental-ness but not eager enough to talk about the guilt that is only the flip side of that experience.
Whatever her experience was it was a part of her reaction to me, in that moment. I could sense it through our conversation and I didn’t push it. The line between felt guilt and perceived judgment is thin to the point of invisibility. And here is the rub.
On the one hand guilt is real, and it often points to a deeper truth. That we are guilty before a holy god, but on the other hand Christians, have, at various times taken advantage of those guilt feelings to extract all manner of things from people. Guilt, among many other things, has become a lever in the exercise of power and subjugation. The modern church cannot ignore its past, nor can it afford to ignore its sins, of which there are many. We cannot condone the disgusting parts of our collective past, but we cannot overlook the other either. This is the irony for the modern Christian apologist.
We must offer apologies for the mistakes and faults of the church. Yet we cannot allow our apologies and our desire to be relevant to somehow turn the gospel into mush and our message into one of appeasement. The gospel cuts two ways, into our hearts and into the hearts of unbelievers. It is only when it is truly doing both that it becomes effective.
This is not the only experience of this type I have had. Many of my non-christian friends will talk about Christianity, but they balk at the idea of church. And many of them have had, at various times in their life, experiences that have turned them off to traditional religion and Christianity in particular.
When I hear a complaint from a non-believing friend that they felt judged the last time they were in church, I hear two things. Perhaps she was actually judged by someone, and the extent to which she could feel this palpably from the churchmembers is a failure to be sure. But the other thing is that beneath her resentment and anger at the church for judging her, is real and palpable guilt.
In an attempt to be accommodating, and open, my friends and I have often been too eager to judge the church for its judgmental-ness but not eager enough to talk about the guilt that is only the flip side of that experience.
Whatever her experience was it was a part of her reaction to me, in that moment. I could sense it through our conversation and I didn’t push it. The line between felt guilt and perceived judgment is thin to the point of invisibility. And here is the rub.
On the one hand guilt is real, and it often points to a deeper truth. That we are guilty before a holy god, but on the other hand Christians, have, at various times taken advantage of those guilt feelings to extract all manner of things from people. Guilt, among many other things, has become a lever in the exercise of power and subjugation. The modern church cannot ignore its past, nor can it afford to ignore its sins, of which there are many. We cannot condone the disgusting parts of our collective past, but we cannot overlook the other either. This is the irony for the modern Christian apologist.
We must offer apologies for the mistakes and faults of the church. Yet we cannot allow our apologies and our desire to be relevant to somehow turn the gospel into mush and our message into one of appeasement. The gospel cuts two ways, into our hearts and into the hearts of unbelievers. It is only when it is truly doing both that it becomes effective.

3 Comments:
There is always that two-sidedness in theology. I think that's why it's so genuis. For some reason, the contrasts provide some sort of positive tension that only leaves the individual pointing to God for answers--hence, the relationship continues to exist. Isn't the word paradoxology? who knows...
By the way, are you going to respond to my message? I've got a b-day coming up; a little get together with a bunch a people and I'd like for you and your special someone to be there. call me...
Things must be busy huh?
Post a Comment
<< Home